BACKGROUND: -Although increased dissemination of Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs) has been associated with more frequent AED use, the trade-off between the number of deployed AEDs and coverage of cardiac arrests remains unclear. We investigated how volunteer-based AED dissemination affected public cardiac arrest coverage in high- and low-risk areas. METHODS AND RESULTS: -All public cardiac arrests (1994-2011) and all registered AEDs (2007-2011) in Copenhagen, Denmark, were identified and geocoded. AED coverage of cardiac arrests was defined as historical arrests ≤100 meters from an AED. High-risk areas were defined as those with ≥1 arrest every 2 years and accounted for 1.0% of the total city area. Of 1864 cardiac arrests, 18.0% (n=335) occurred in high-risk areas throughout the study period. From 2007-2011, the number of AEDs and the corresponding coverage of cardiac arrests increased from 36 to 552 and from 2.7% to 32.6%, respectively. The corresponding increase for high-risk areas was from 1 to 30 AEDs and coverage from 5.7% to 51.3%, respectively. Since the AED network establishment (2007-2011) few arrests (n=55) occurred ≤100 meters of an AED with only 14.5% (n=8) being defibrillated before EMS arrival. CONCLUSIONS: -Despite the lack of a coordinated public access defibrillation program, the number of AEDs increased 15-fold with a corresponding increase in cardiac arrest coverage from 2.7% to 32.6% over a 5-year period. The highest increase in coverage was observed in high-risk areas (from 5.7% to 51.3%). AED networks can be used as useful tools to optimize AED placement in community settings.
Circulation (baltimore), 2014, Vol 130, Issue 21, p. 1859-1867
Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cohort Studies; Community Networks; Defibrillators; Denmark; Electric Countershock; Emergency Medical Services; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Time Factors; Volunteers; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't