Khan, Shfaqat Abbas1; Kjeldsen, Kristian Kjellerup3; Kjær, Kurt H.3; Bevan, Suzanne9; Luckman, Adrian9; Aschwanden, A.5; Bjørk, Anders Anker3; Korsgaard, Niels J.3; Box, Jason E.10; van den Broeke, Michiel R7; van Dam, Tonie M11; Fitzner, Antje3
1 National Space Institute, Technical University of Denmark2 Geodesy, National Space Institute, Technical University of Denmark3 University of Copenhagen4 Swansea University5 University of Alaska Fairbanks6 Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland7 Utrecht University8 University of Luxembourg9 Swansea University10 Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland11 University of Luxembourg
Observations over the past decade show significant ice loss associated with the speed-up of glaciers in southeast Greenland from 2003, followed by a deceleration from 2006. These short-term, episodic, dynamic perturbations have a major impact on the mass balance on the decadal scale. To improve the projection of future sea level rise, a long-term data record that reveals the mass balance beyond such episodic events is required. Here, we extend the observational record of marginal thinning of Helheim and Kangerdlugssuaq glaciers from 10 to more than 80 years. We show that, although the frontal portion of Helheim Glacier thinned by more than 100 m between 2003 and 2006, it thickened by more than 50 m during the previous two decades. In contrast, Kangerdlugssuaq Glacier underwent minor thinning of 40–50 m from 1981 to 1998 and major thinning of more than 100 m after 2003. Extending the record back to the end of the Little Ice Age (prior to 1930) shows no thinning of Helheim Glacier from its maximum extent during the Little Ice Age to 1981, while Kangerdlugssuaq Glacier underwent substantial thinning of 230 to 265 m. Comparison of sub-surface water temperature anomalies and variations in air temperature to records of thickness and velocity change suggest that both glaciers are highly sensitive to short-term atmospheric and ocean forcing, and respond very quickly to small fluctuations. On century timescales, however, multiple external parameters (e.g. outlet glacier shape) may dominate the mass change. These findings suggest that special care must be taken in the projection of future dynamic ice loss.