Holst, M1; Beermann, T3; Mortensen, M N2; Skadhauge, L B2; Lindorff-Larsen, K5; Rasmussen, H H3
1 Aalborg University Hospital, The Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, VBN2 The Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, VBN3 Klinik Medicin, The Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, VBN4 Medicinske Mave- og Tarmsygdomme (Gastroenterologi og Hepatologi), The Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, VBN5 Forskningsadministrationen, Aalborg Universitetshospital, The Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, VBN6 NordSim - Center for færdighedstræning og Simulation, The Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, VBN7 Department of Clinical Medicine, The Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, VBN
A one year follow-up study
BACKGROUND: Good nutritional practice (GNP) includes screening, nutrition plan and monitoring, and is mandatory for targeted treatment of malnourished patients in hospital. AIMS: To optimize energy- and protein-intake in patients at nutritional risk and to improve GNP in a hospital setting. METHODS: A 12-months observational multi-modal intervention study was done, using the top-down and bottom-up principle. All hospitalized patients (>3 days) were included. Setting: A university hospital with 758 beds and all specialities. Measurements: Record audit of GNP, energy- and protein-intake by 24-h recall, patient interviews and staff questionnaire before and after the intervention. Interventions: Based on pre-measurements, nutrition support teams in each department made targeted action plans, supervised by an expert team. Education, diagnose-specific nutrition plans, improved menus and eating environment, and awareness were initiated. Statistics: Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis test was used for ordinal data, and Pearson Chi square test for nominative data. RESULTS: Overall 545 patients participated (287 before/258 after) from 26/22 departments. There were no significant differences regarding sex, age, BMI or previous weight loss before and after the intervention. Result-indicators: Energy intake improved from 52% to 68% (p < 0.007), and protein intake from 33% to 52% (p < 0.001) (>75% of requirements). Intake of less than 50% of requirements decreased with 50%. Process-indicators: Screening improved from 56% to 77% (p < 0.001), nutrition plans from 21% to 56% (p < 0.0001), and monitoring food intake from 29% to 58% (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Intake of energy and protein as well as GNP improved using a multi-modal top-down and bottom-up approach.
Clinical Nutrition, 2015, Vol 34, Issue 2, p. 315-322