1 Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark2 Production and Service Management, Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark3 Risk Research Group, Production and Service Management, Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark4 Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark5 European Commission - Joint Research Center
Evaluations of the performance of simplified engineering and CFD models are important to improve risk assessment tools e.g. to predict accurately releases from various types of hydrogen storages. These tools have to predict releases from a wide range of storage pressures (up to 80 MPa) and temperatures (down to 20 K), e.g. cryogenic compressed gas storage covers pressures up to 35 MPa and temperatures between 33 K and 338 K. Accurate calculations of high pressure releases require real gas EOS. This paper compares a number of EOS to predict hydrogen properties typical in different storage types. The vessel dynamics are modeled using a simplified engineering and a CFD model to evaluate the performance of various EOS to predict vessel pressures, temperatures mass flow rates and jet flame lengths. It is shown that the chosen EOS and the chosen specific heat capacity correlation are important to model accurately hydrogen releases at low temperatures.
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, Vol 39, Issue 14
Compressed hydrogen; Low temperature; Vessel dynamics; Simplified model; CFD; EOS