{"controller"=>"catalog", "action"=>"show", "id"=>"261057496"}
  • EN
  • DA

Danish NationalResearch Database

  • Search Publications & Researchers
  • Open Access Indicator
  • Publications
  • Researchers
Example Finds records
water{} containing the word "water".
water supplies"{}" containing the phrase "water supplies".
author:"Doe, John"author:"{}" containing the prase "Doe, John" in the author field.
title:IEEEtitle:{} containing the word "IEEE" in the title field.
Need more help? Advanced search tutorial
  • Selected (0)
  • History

Cost-effective IMTA: a comparison of the production efficiencies of mussels and seaweed

    • Save to Mendeley
    • Export to BibTeX
    • Export to RIS
    • Email citation
Authors:
  • Holdt, Susan Løvstad ;
    Close
    Orcid logo0000-0002-6888-782X
    National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark
  • Edwards, Maeve D.
    Close
    The Ryan Institute
DOI:
10.1007/s10811-014-0273-y
Abstract:
This paper compares the biofilter capacity and cost-effectiveness of blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) and seaweed for use in integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) based on experiences in Ireland and Denmark. This comparison shows that weight for weight, mussels are a better biofilter than seaweed with regard to the amount of nitrogen assimilated. Furthermore, in optimized systems, areal requirement for mussels is similar to the cultivation of the same tonnage (1,000 t) of seaweed (approximately 8 ha). The cost-effectiveness of a mussel biofilter is €11–30 kg−1 nitrogen (N) removed based on various examples compared to production costs of €209–672 removed and €1,013 kg−1 N removed, respectively, for Laminaria digitata and Alaria esculenta from extrapolated laboratory and field trials. However, commercial seaweed (Saccharina latissima) producers claim that production costs are less than €10–38 kg−1 N removed. These up-scaled and commercial figures make the seaweed cost competitive to mussels for removal of nitrogen. Disadvantages such as predators (e.g. eider ducks) and biofouling should also be taken into account before choice of biofilter is made. These drawbacks can reduce overall biofilter capacity and biomass value as a consequence of biomass spoilage or loss. However, disadvantages may be mitigated by seasonal choice of cultivation and harvest times. Cultivation technologies and harvesting methods may be improved together with breeding to improve the cost-efficiency of the biofilter, especially in the newer European seaweed cultivation. Furthermore, upscaling of IMTA to commercial proportions, other than the Danish example, would allow more real data on production costs and revenues.
Type:
Journal article
Language:
English
Published in:
Journal of Applied Phycology, 2014, Vol 26, Issue 2, p. 933-945
Main Research Area:
Science/technology
Publication Status:
Published
Review type:
Peer Review
Submission year:
2014
Scientific Level:
Scientific
ID:
261057496

Full text access

  • Doi Get publisher edition via DOI resolver
Checking for on-site access...

On-site access

At institution

  • Technical university of dk

Metrics

Feedback

Sitemap

  • Search
    • Statistics
    • Tutorial
    • Data
    • FAQ
    • Contact
  • Open Access
    • Overview
    • Development
    • FAQ
    • Contact
  • About
    • Institutions
    • Release History
    • Cookies and privacy policy

Copyright © 1998–2018.

Fivu en