Jürgensen, Henrik J7; Johansson, Kristina7; Madsen, Daniel H3; Porse, Astrid3; Melander, Maria C3; Sørensen, Kristine Rothaus8; Nielsen, Christoffer9; Bugge, Thomas H3; Behrendt, Niels9; Engelholm, Lars H10
1 Behrendt Group, BRIC Research Groups, BRIC, Københavns Universitet2 Engelholm Group, BRIC Research Groups, BRIC, Københavns Universitet3 unknown4 Experimental Animal Models, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Københavns Universitet5 Behrendt Group, BRIC, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Københavns Universitet6 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Københavns Universitet7 Behrendt Group, BRIC Research Groups, BRIC, Københavns Universitet8 Experimental Animal Models, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Københavns Universitet9 Behrendt Group, BRIC, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Københavns Universitet10 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Københavns Universitet
Members of the well-conserved mannose receptor (MR) protein family have been functionally implicated in diverse biological and pathological processes. Importantly, a proposed common function is the internalization of collagen for intracellular degradation occurring during bone development, cancer invasion, and fibrosis protection. This functional relationship is suggested by a common endocytic capability and a candidate collagen-binding domain. Here we conducted a comparative investigation of each member's ability to facilitate intracellular collagen degradation. As expected, the family members uPARAP/Endo180 and MR bound collagens in a purified system and internalized collagens for degradation in cellular settings. In contrast, the remaining family members, PLA2R and DEC-205, showed no collagen binding activity and were unable to mediate collagen internalization. To pinpoint the structural elements discriminating collagen from non-collagen receptors, we constructed a series of receptor chimeras and loss- and gain-of-function mutants. Using this approach we identified a critical collagen binding loop in the suggested collagen binding region (an FN-II domain) in uPARAP/Endo180 and MR, which was different in PLA2R or DEC-205. However, we also found that an active FN-II domain was not a sufficient determinant to allow collagen internalization through these receptors. Nevertheless, this ability could be acquired by the transfer of a larger segment of uPARAP/Endo180 (the Cys-rich domain, the FN-II domain and two CTLDs) to DEC-205. These data underscore the importance of the FN-II domain in uPARAP/Endo180 and MR-mediated collagen internalization but at the same time uncover a critical interplay with flanking domains.
Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2014, Vol 289, Issue 11, p. 7935-7947