Egeland, Charles P.4; Nielsen, Trine Kellberg7; Byø, Malene5; Kjærgaard, Peter C.6; Larsen, Nicolaj Krog8; Riede, Felix7
1 School of Culture and Society - Prehistoric Archaeology, subject, School of Culture and Society, Arts, Aarhus University2 School of Culture and Society - History of Ideas, subject, School of Culture and Society, Arts, Aarhus University3 Department of Geoscience, Science and Technology, Aarhus University4 Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro5 Department of Culture and Society, Aarhus University6 unknown7 School of Culture and Society - Prehistoric Archaeology, subject, School of Culture and Society, Arts, Aarhus University8 Department of Geoscience, Science and Technology, Aarhus University
The ecological tolerances of Neandertals, their ability to subsist in the dense forests of full interglacials, and their capacity to colonize northern latitudes are the subject of ongoing debate. The site of Hollerup (northern Denmark) lies at the northern extreme of the Neandertal range. Dated by various techniques to the Eemian interglacial (MIS 5e), this site has yielded the remains of several purportedly butchered fallow deer (Dama dama). Taphonomic reanalysis of the remains from Hollerup and a handful of other Eemian-aged fallow deer skeletons cast doubt on the interpretation that they were humanly modified. We place this revised conclusion into the wider context of human settlement of southern Scandinavia during the Eemian. Other claims of Neandertal presence in the region rest on candidate Middle Paleolithic artifacts, all of which derive from surface contexts. With the fallow deer material removed as a secure indicator of Neandertal settlement of Denmark during the last interglacial, this lithic material must be viewed with renewed skepticism. While ecological and/or topographic factors may have played an important role in preventing Neandertals from penetrating into peninsular Scandinavia, we caution that geological, taphonomic, research-historical, and demographic factors may have significantly distorted our picture of their occupation in this region.
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2014, Vol 6, Issue 1, p. 31-61