1 Office for Study Programmes and Student Affairs, Administration, Technical University of Denmark2 Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark3 Algorithms and Logic, Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark4 KTH - Royal Institute of Technology5 Aalto University6 Chalmers University of Technology7 Norwegian University of Science and Technology8 Aalto University9 Norwegian University of Science and Technology
In this paper a continuation research at five technical universities in Nordic countries (N5T network) in 2012 is presented, where the aim was to find out how the program leaders conceived their function, role and mandate, and the work situations between the universities were compared. The previous research demonstrated that program leaders have quite different positions, strategies and methods when it comes to monitoring and developing their programs. In this paper, a deeper investigation is carried out of the (im-) possibilities to make real influence on the study courses that constitutes the respective Engineering study programs. Eight program leaders from the five N5T universities have been interviewed, and the analysis of these studies, has culminated in a model for the analysis of program leadership for Engineering education development.
Proceedings of 9th International Cdio Conference, 2013