1 Department of Political Science, Aarhus BSS, Aarhus University2 Syddansk Universitet3 Department of Political Science, Aarhus BSS, Aarhus University
The costs of consensus-building in Local Agenda 21
Is local participation always optimal for sustainable action? Here, Local Agenda 21 is a relevant case as it broadly calls for consensus-building among stakeholders. Consensus-building is, however, costly. We show that the costs of making local decisions are likely to rapidly exceed the benefits. Why? Because as the number of participants grows, the more likely it is that the group will include individuals who have an extreme position and are unwilling to make compromises. Thus, the net gain of self-organization should be compared with those of its alternatives, for example voting, market-solutions, or not making any choices at all. Even though the informational value of meetings may be helpful to policy makers, the model shows that it also decreases as the number of participants increase. Overall, the result is a thought provoking scenario for Local Agenda 21 as it highlights the risk of less sustainable action in the future.
Journal of Environmental Management, 2013, Vol 129, p. 266-273
Local participation; Sustainability; Local Agenda 21; Consensus; Free riding