Walton, David M3; Carroll, Linda J4; Kasch, Helge11; Sterling, Michele6; Verhagen, Arianne P7; Macdermid, Joy C8; Gross, Anita8; Santaguida, P Lina8; Carlesso, Lisa9
1 Department of Clinical Medicine - The Department of Neurology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University2 Department of Dentistry and Oral Health - Dentistry, Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, Health, Aarhus University3 Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, London Ontario, Canada.4 Department of Public Health Sciences and Alberta Centre for Injury Control Research, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton Alberta5 Department of Clinical Medicine - The Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western Danmark, Department of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University6 Centre for National Research on Disability and Rehabilitation Medicine (CONROD), The University of Queensland, Brisbane7 Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Centre University, Rotterdam8 School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton Ontario9 Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostastistics, McMaster University, Hamilton Ontario10 unknown11 Department of Clinical Medicine - The Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western Danmark, Department of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University
Given the challenges of chronic musculoskeletal pain and disability, establishing a clear prognosis in the acute stage has become increasingly recognized as a valuable approach to mitigate chronic problems. Neck pain represents a condition that is common, potentially disabling, and has a high rate of transition to chronic or persistent problems. As a field of research, prognosis in neck pain has stimulated several empirical primary research papers, and a number of systematic reviews. As part of the International Consensus on Neck (ICON) project, we sought to establish the general state of knowledge in the area through a structured, systematic review of systematic reviews (overview). An exhaustive search strategy was created and employed to identify the 13 systematic reviews (SRs) that served as the primary data sources for this overview. A decision algorithm for data synthesis, which incorporated currency of the SR, risk of bias assessment of the SRs using AMSTAR scoring and consistency of findings across SRs, determined the level of confidence in the risk profile of 133 different variables. The results provide high confidence that baseline neck pain intensity and baseline disability have a strong association with outcome, while angular deformities of the neck and parameters of the initiating trauma have no effect on outcome. A vast number of predictors provide low or very low confidence or inconclusive results, suggesting there is still much work to be done in this field. Despite the presence of multiple SR and this overview, there is insufficient evidence to make firm conclusions on many potential prognostic variables. This study demonstrates the challenges in conducting overviews on prognosis where clear synthesis critieria and a lack of specifics of primary data in SR are barriers.
Journal review article
Open Orthopaedics Journal, 2013, Vol 7, p. 494-505