1 Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center, Science and Technology, Aarhus University2 Faculty of Physics, Universität Wien and Center for Computational Materials Science, Sensengasse 8/12, A-1090 Wien, Austria3 Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center - INANO-Fysik, iNANO-huset, Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center, Science and Technology, Aarhus University4 Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center - INANO-Fysik, iNANO-huset, Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center, Science and Technology, Aarhus University
When wurtzite ZnO is sliced perpendicular to the (0001) axis, two different polar surfaces, the (0001)-Zn and (0001̅ )-O terminated surfaces, are formed. In a simple ionic picture, both surfaces are electrostatically unstable due to a diverging electrostatic energy. Although the ionic picture is an oversimplification, the surfaces adopt a modified surface structure to compensate for the polarity. In close collaboration with experiment, a hexagonal honeycomblike reconstruction has been suggested [ J. V. Lauritsen et al. ACS Nano 5 5987 (2011)]. The remarkable observation is that the (0001̅ )-O surface behaves very differently than the (0001)-Zn surface. Here, we present a detailed density functional theory investigation of the (0001̅ )-O surface, including a systematic investigation of H and Zn coverage as well as an investigation of various surface reconstructions. The difference between the two polar surfaces is explained by the different bonding preferences of Zn and O atoms: as a d element, Zn atoms are more flexible in their bond formation than O atoms.
Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 2013, Vol 87, Issue 8