Harmsen, Charlotte Gry2; Jarbøl, Dorte Ejg2; Nexøe, Jørgen3; Støvring, Henrik7; Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte4; Nielsen, Jesper Bo4; Edwards, Adrian5; Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø6
1 Department of Public Health - Department of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, Health, Aarhus University2 Syddansk Universitet3 Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark4 Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark5 Cochrane Institute of Primary Care & Public Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University6 Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo7 Department of Public Health - Department of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, Health, Aarhus University
the "Influence of intervention Methodologies on Patient Choice of Therapy (IMPACT)" cluster-randomised trial in general practice
BACKGROUND: Risk communication is an integral part of shared decision-making in health care. In the context of interventions for chronic diseases it represents a particular challenge for all health practitioners. By using two different quantitative formats to communicate risk level and effectiveness of a cholesterol-lowering drug, we posed the research question: how does the format of risk information influence patients' decisions concerning therapy, patients' satisfaction with the communication as well as confidence in the decision. We hypothesise that patients are less prone to accept therapy when the benefits of long-term intervention are presented in terms of prolongation of life (POL) in months compared to the absolute risk reduction (ARR). We hypothesise that patients presented with POL will be more satisfied with the communication and confident in their decision, suggesting understanding of the time-related term. METHODS/DESIGN: In 2009 a sample of 328 general practitioners (GPs) in the Region of Southern Denmark was invited to participate in a primary care-based clinical trial among patients making real-life clinical decisions together with their GP. Interested GPs were cluster-randomised to inform patients about cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and the effectiveness of statin therapy using either POL or ARR. The GPs attended a training session before informing their patients. Before training and after the trial period they received a questionnaire about their attitudes to risk communication and the use of numerical information. Patients' redemptions of statin prescriptions will be registered in a regional prescription database to evaluate a possible association between redemption rates and effectiveness format. The Combined Outcome Measure for Risk Communication And Treatment Decision Making Effectiveness (COMRADE) questionnaire will be used to measure patients' confidence and satisfaction with the risk communication immediately after the conversation with their GPs. DISCUSSION: This randomised clinical trial compares the impact of two effectiveness formats on real-life risk communication between patients and GPs, including affective patient outcomes and actual choices about acceptance of therapy. Though we found difficulties in recruiting GPs, according to the study protocol we have succeeded in engaging sufficient GPs for the trial, enabling us to perform the planned analyses.
B M C Health Services Research, 2013, Vol 13, Issue 76, p. 1-8