Hansen, Anne Merrild1; Kørnøv, Lone3; Cashmore, Matthew Asa3; Richardson, Tim6
1 Department of Development and Planning, The Faculty of Engineering and Science (ENG), Aalborg University, VBN2 The Faculty of Engineering and Science (TECH), Aalborg University, VBN3 The Danish Centre for Environmental Assessment, The Faculty of Engineering and Science (ENG), Aalborg University, VBN4 Sustainable Cities, The Faculty of Engineering and Science (ENG), Aalborg University, VBN5 Center for Design, Innovation and Sustainable Transitions, The Faculty of Engineering and Science (ENG), Aalborg University, VBN6 Urban Planning and Mobility, The Faculty of Engineering and Science (ENG), Aalborg University, VBN7 Centre for Mobility and Urban Studies, The Faculty of Engineering and Science (ENG), Aalborg University, VBN
This article presents a study of how power dynamics enables and constrains the influence of actors upon decision-making and Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA). Based on Anthony Giddens structuration theory (ST), a model for studying power dynamics in strategic decision-making processes is developed and used to explore how reflexive agents bring about change. The model is used to map and analyse key decision arenas in the decision process of aluminium production in Greenland. The analysis shows that communication lines are an important resource through which actors exercise power and influence decision-making on the location of the aluminium production. The SEA process involved not only reproduction of formal communication and decision competence but also production of alternative informal communication structures in which the SEA had capability to influence. It is concluded, that actors influence both outcome and frames for strategic decision making and attention needs to be on not only the formal interactions between SEA process and strategic decision-making process but also on informal interaction and communication between actors. The informal structures shows crucial to the outcome of the decision-making process. The article is meant as a supplement to the understanding of power dynamics influence in IA processes emphasising the capacity of agents to mobilise and create change. Despite epistemological challenges of using ST theory as an approach to power analysis, this meta theory is found to provide an interesting and wider lens through which to view and analyse power dynamics in strategic decision-making. The article ends by considering possibilities for future research and practice within the IA field.
Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2013, Vol 39, p. 37-45