1 Section of Systematic Theology, Sections on Theology - Technical area, Faculty of Theology, Københavns Universitet2 The board of studies for Theology, Faculty of Theology, Københavns Universitet3 Institut for Ledelse, Politik og Filosofi4 The board of studies for Theology, Faculty of Theology, Københavns Universitet
Towards a happy marriage?
This article suggests that certain intertwinements can be discerned between contemporary public policies and post-structural thinking, emblematically represented by Foucault and scholars drawing upon his work. The article demonstrates that the post-structural perspective on power, while recognising its strengths and efficacy, confines observers to a particular form of analytical critique, which sets specific limits for what can be observed and debated. The position of Nikolas Rose is discussed with a specific attention to his diagnosis of the adoption of ‘community’ as a governmental category and his understanding of the relationship between power and critique. A significant challenge for this form of critique is the recent embracing of concepts of ‘diversity’ and ‘pluralism’, both in welfare reforms and service arrangements. Another difficulty is posed by how to engage with the material conditions of critical practice which implies analytical critique and resistance through creative self-formation. The article suggests some dislocations of the generalized Foucaultian position on public policy that seem increasingly necessary in the present situation.
Review of European Studies, 2012, Vol 4, Issue 1, p. 138-147
Public Policy; Foucault; Post structuralism; Critique; Diversity