1 Centre for Discourse Studies, The Faculty of Humanities, Aalborg University, VBN2 Department of Language and Culture, The Faculty of Humanities, Aalborg University, VBN3 Communication and culture in professional context, The Faculty of Humanities, Aalborg University, VBN4 The Discourse and Society Network, The Faculty of Humanities, Aalborg University, VBN5 Talking culture - a study of discursive constructions of culture and their effect on interaction in professional settings, The Faculty of Humanities, Aalborg University, VBN6 Department of Culture and Global Studies, The Faculty of Humanities, Aalborg University, VBN7 C-DiT - Centre for Discourses in Transition, The Faculty of Humanities, Aalborg University, VBN
Like in many other European countries, the Danish financial sector is one in which the male occupation of managerial positions predominates, with women tending to occupy lower-ranking jobs. Social constructivist research has pointed out that this inequality is connected to the way men and women interact discursively (e.g. Sunderland 2004; Holmes 2006; Litosseliti 2006). A recent study tested this claim against the analysis of metaphorical constructions of gender and career issues in a Danish bank, finding that when female and male managers are organised into single-sex groups, they tend to use metaphors that reflect dominant discourses on gender, resorting only briefly to constructing gendered subject positions (author 2009). The paper takes its starting point in this study arguing that single-sex interview groups promote stereotypical gender constructions among female and male managers. However, if organised into e.g. mixed-sex groups, men and women are likely to construct their own and the opposite sex along lines that reflect more diversity and hence, tend to adopt metaphors that reflect a number of gendered subject positions. To establish the validity of this claim, the paper will present the analysis of a number of mixed-sex focus group interviews conducted in a Danish bank in 2007. Taking a critical approach to metaphor, the discussion will include conceptual aspects of metaphor, but will also consider the influence of contextual aspects on the instantiation and meaning of gender metaphors (e.g. Cameron and Deignan 2006; Charteris-Black 2007). References Cameron, L. and Deignan, A. 2006. The emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied Linguistics 27, 4: 671-690. Charteris-Black, J. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. London/New York: Palgrave. Holmes, J. 2006. Gendered Talk at Work – Constructing Gender Identity through Workplace Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell. Author 2009 Litosseliti, L. 2006. Gender and Language: Theory and Practice. London: Hodder Arnold. Sunderland, J. 2004. Gendered Discourses. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave.
Gender; Discourse; Metaphor; Interviews
Main Research Area:
Sixth International Gender and Language Conference, 2010