Taskinen, Matti2; Mäntysaari, Esa2; Lidauer, Martin2; Knürr, Timo2; Pösö, Jukka3; Su, Guosheng5; Aamand, Gert Pedersen4; Strandén, Ismo2
1 Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics - Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Science and Technology, Aarhus University2 MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Biotechnology and Food Research, Biometrical Genetics3 Faba co-op4 NAV Nordic Cattle Genetic Evaluation5 Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics - Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Science and Technology, Aarhus University
Model based reliabilities in genetic evaluation are compared between three methods: animal model BLUP, single-step BLUP, and bivariate blending after genomic BLUP. The original bivariate blending is revised in this work to better account animal models. The study data is extracted from the production trait evaluation of Nordic Red dairy cattle. Genotyped bulls with daughters are used as training animals, and genotyped bulls and producing cows as candidate animals. For simplicity, size of the data is chosen so that the full inverses of the mixed model equation coefficient matrices can be calculated. Model reliabilities by the single-step and the bivariate blending methods were higher than by animal model due to genomic information. Compared to the single-step method, the bivariate blending method reliability estimates were, in general, lower. Computationally bivariate blending method was, on the other hand, lighter than the single-step method.
Proceedings of the 2013 Interbull Meeting: Interbull Bulletin, 2013, p. 246-251